Fire stop system for wallboard and metal fluted deck construction

ABSTRACT

The present invention describes a fire stop system for wall board construction. The patent addresses the problem of a gap between the head of a wall and a metal fluted deck. Described here-in is a fire resistance assembly made of multiple components of: a fire stop panel and a mounting channel. The fire stop panel or wall has a wallboard geometry manufactured to match the contour shape of a metal fluted deck in a “cookie cutter” fashion. This provides the advantages of saving time and material of wallboard construction, with a product that is novel, simple, and easy to manufacture and implement. The mounting channel of the fire stop system provides for an effective way to provide compliance of the stresses from the roofing/ceiling deck&#39;s stresses, easy assembly of the fire stop system, while allowing for a meeting of the fire safety rating.

REFERENCES

U.S. Pat. No. 5,666,775 Shreiner, et al. Sep. 16, 1997

U.S. Pat. No. 6,102,641 Hildebrandt Aug. 15, 2000

U.S. Pat. No. 4,936,064 Gibb Jun. 26, 1990

U.S. Pat. No. 4,831,808 Wynar May 23, 1989

U.S. Pat. No. 5,301,475 Stefely Apr. 12, 1994

U.S. Pat. No. 6,128,874 Olson, et al. Oct. 10, 2000

U.S. Pat. No. 4,837,999 Stayner Jun. 13, 1989

Haberman U.S. Pat. No. 6,216,410 Apr. 17, 2001

Scott U.S. Pat. No. 5,022,210 * Jun. 11, 1991

Huguet U.S. Pat. No. 4,154,030 May 15, 1979

U.S. Pat. No. 4,478,018 Holand Oct. 23, 1984

U.S. Pat. No. 4,123,575 Oct. 31, 1978 Wesch, et al.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,486,553 Wesch Dec. 4, 1984

U.S. Pat. No. 4,338,374 Neser Jul. 6, 1982

U.S. Pat. No. 4,008,187 Turley Feb. 15, 1977

U.S. Pat. No. 6,755,907 Westerman, et al. Jun. 29, 2004

U.S. Pat. No. 6,929,875 Savoly, et al Aug. 16, 2005

U.S. Pat. No. 6,489,040 Rohlf, et al. Dec. 3, 2002

U.S. Pat. No. 6,112,488 Olson, et al Sep. 5, 2000

U.S. Pat. No. 6,691,478 Daudet, et al. Feb. 17, 2004

U.S. Pat. No. 4,866,900 Dunn Sep. 19, 1989

U.S. Pat. No. 4,850,169 Burkstrand, et al. Jul. 25, 1989

U.S. Pat. No. 3,977,144 Jahn Aug. 31, 1976

U.S. Pat. No. 4,631,884 Reynolds Dec. 30, 1986

TECHNICAL FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is directed to a fire resistant barrier for use in building structures; more particularly directed to a fire smoke resistant barrier at the interface at head of wallboard construction and ceiling/roofing metal fluted deck.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

A fire wall is composed of material that has the ability to resist fire. which subdivides a building or adjoins separate buildings, which under fire conditions has the ability to maintain structural integrity. If the fire wall requires a mounting or construction with multiple components, the device or method is usually called a fire-stop system or assembly. Determining the fire rating is usually not done analytically but rather experimentally. The ASTM (American Standard for the Testing of Materials), specifies testing standard for fire resistant materials, specifically with tests ASTME-814 and ASTME-E 119. The ASTME-814 test specifies furnace test for materials to establish fire ratings of specific materials, and ASTME-119 specifically for fire retardant wallboard structures. ⅝ inch gypsum wallboard. according to ASTM E119, should provide a one hour fire rating for a wall, column, slabs, floor; roof, ceilings, and wallboard structural components. In addition to ASTM standards local fire codes for municipalities and local governments are based on a large part on National Fire Protection Association (NFPA). The NFPA codes are categorized by type of fire hazard. The NFPA codes that specifically apply to this patent are:

-   -   NFPA 92A: Recommended practices for Smoke-Controlled Systems     -   NFPA203: Guide on Roofing Deck Coverings and Roof Deck         Constructions     -   NFPA 221: Standard for Fire Walls and Fire Barriers     -   NFPA 251: Standard for Tests of Fire Endurance of Building and         Construction and materials     -   NFPA 101: Code for Life Safety from Burning Buildings and Fire         Materials with various additives for increased structural         strength, decreased weight, increased fire resistance, and other         material properties are well documented within the literature.         U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,008,187 4,123,575 4,338,374 4,486,553 by         Turley, Wesch et al., Neser, and Wesch respectively. Turley         defines a polyurethane foams are containing flame retardant         additives; Where Neser's patent is for a fire proof material         alkali and metal silicate solution. Each of these patents's         scope is in regard to a specific materials and their method of         manufacture. Each of Wesch's patent's are in regard to fireproof         layered materials consisting of resin, disclose material         properties and method of production.

Additives and material composition patents for gypsum wallboard specifically also exist in the prior art. One example is U.S. Pat. No. 6,755,907 by Westerman, et al., which describes a gypsum composition made with a styrene butadiene latex additive. The added latex makes the board lighter and less dense, while maintaining the strength of the wallboard. Also included in the literature are methods of manufacturing wallboard for improved properties. The U.S. Pat. No. 6,929,875 by Savoy, et al. invented a method of manufacture which includes dispersant and foaming agent combination for production of gypsum wallboard and other aqueous cementitious products; which has the benefit of more efficiently entrains air creating void space, and thereby lowering the board's weight without detrimentally affecting strength. A further improvement on the field is made in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 6,489,040 by Rohlf, et al.. Paper cover sheets usually dress gypsum wallboard. The wallboard usually had problems involving delaminating and peeling off of the wall paper sheets. The patent defines an additive of resin to improve adhesion of the paper to the wallboard. In addition to wallboard's chemical composition and manufacturing process, the materials necessary for sealing and joining wall boards are also part of the prior art. U.S. patent by Olson, et al., U.S. Pat. No 6,112,488 define a fire barrier material for gaskets for architectural joints. The joining of two surfaces by an intumescent material creates an adhesion.

The patent disclosed herein may be comprised of any fire retardant or fire resistant material, although it is preferable that it be made for a gypsum wallboard construction. Use of a caulking material or intumescent coating in installation, although preferable, does not interfere with the scope of this patent. The wallboard should preferably have a paper coating, as described in the literature, and more specifically by Rolf, et al.. However, to avoid peeling and adhesion problems on the dressing, it is preferable to have a metal stripe on the bottom of the invention to provide an aesthetic and functional dressing.

In addition to the patentability of materials, the prior art shows the patentability of pre-fabricated panels and methods of construction that either consist of fire proof or fire retardant materials. A patent by Stayner (U.S. Pat. No. 4,837,999) discloses an invention for a panel to be used as a prefabricated wall and/or roof panels having an inner and outer skin coupled to a center core are known in the art. The panel is specified to made of a material which will not become toxic in case of a fire. A further example of a prefabricated panel is described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,216,410 by Haberman, which discloses an invention for a prefabricated panel, which can provides a modular method of interlocking panel construction. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,022,210, 4,154,030, 4,478,018 define systems of prefabricated methods of construction that involves components, interlocks and joints that interlock for making prefabricated buildings or rooms. All of these patent disclosed show how the shape and function of the wallboards, method of construction, and specified materials may provide distinct advantages in a novel fashion. They do not however address the specific problem of that this patent address, of filling structural gaps, and more specifically gap between a metal deck and head of a wallboard.

Methods of filling structural holes, gaps, and sealing for building surfaces exist by various methods, and is a major area of the prior art with numerous patents. One method for securing a wallboard panel, which has the advantage of providing a seal between wallboards by Wynar, in U.S. Pat. No. 4,831,808. Wynar describes a system of distortable mechanical clips made of a resilient material which secure wallboards. When joined, the seal in-between the wallboard forms a tight barrier in the surface of the built wall for fire and smoke. Furthermore as the gypsum wallboard distortions while retaining, the clip my mechanical means will readjust to maintain a fire and smoke proof seal longer. Another mechanism in wall board construction and construction in general is for a mechanical hole plugging device by Hildebrandt, in U.S. Pat. No. 6,102,641. The device described a method of installing hole plug consisting of at least two notched washers on a threaded shaft with a bolt head. One washer can be placed in hole to be repaired, and the other as a exterior washer providing support. The damaged section of the structure can then be sealed after tightening the device, making it fire and smoke retardant. A hole plug disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,301,475, by Stefly, addresses a hole specifically for a fire stop device. Stefly addresses the problem of fire and smoke passing through structural walls where piping for conduit is passing through. The piping is normally lined with a caulking for improved fire retarding purposes. The invention describes a mechanical support layer where the base-plate of which automatically closes if the pipe where to melt improving the fire and smoke resistance.

The patents of Wynar, Stefly, Hildebrandt illustrate that mechanisms of construction, and devices for sealing structural holes are patentable innovations. However these devices do not define the scope of this invention, nor do they solve the problem of sealing the gap between the fluted deck and wall head of the wall to meet fire and smoke codes. While they contribute to the fire retardant integrity of the structure, they do not define the structure itself, or a panel which seals holes in structures.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,936,064 by Gibb, and U.S. Pat. No. 5,666,775 by Shreiner et al., and U.S. Pat. No. 5,301,475 by Olsen, et al. are indicative of patent where the scope includes novel application specific panels and methods of construction. Shreiner's and Olsen's inventions relate to a fireproof panel for closing openings in between structures, specifically for between walls and/or ceilings. The patents address the issue gaps in structures and goes on to claim the panel as a joint cover and method of joining. The patents continue to describe the benefits of noise level control, sustaining of earthquakes by allowing greater movement to occur, and fire proofing qualities. Olsen's patent differs in that the panel is multi-layer: one for mechanical support and the other a fire retardant material which has the advantage of replacing silicone caulking. While these patents describes a panel used in covering structural gaps, this panel's primary purpose is for a cover that acts as a cover for structural expansion joints prone to disturbance and stresses from earthquakes. Gibb's patent is for a more general applications which describes a fireproof panel for closing openings found within structures due to gaps in existing construction, or holes that must exist to allow for pipes, electrical conduits, and other hardware. The panel described a multi-layer panel with an exterior made of a reinforcing material for shape and structural integrity, and fire resistant filler. Gibb's goes on to define materials and the how the geometry may be varied to meet the specific application of panel, and further illustrates how the invention may be applied. Gibb's work could be used to fire-proof almost any gap, including the gap at the head of the wall board and fluted deck, as can any fireproof panel may be cut or shaped. However Gibb's primary purpose is to provide a means of construction to allow gaps caused by construction for electrical conduit, ducts, pipes, and other building service hardware, to be made aesthetically and structurally dressed while maintaining fire safety compliance. Gibb's patent would still be too time consuming, difficult to implement, and expensive to solve the problem of filling the gap at the head of the wall board and fluted deck. This present patent describes an application specific wall-board section which would increase the speed and decrease the cost in wallboard construction fireproofing, because of its specific of matching the gap in the deck.

Most construction of drywall panel involves having a plurality of joists, and having the wallboard nailed on to an existing frame. One patent in the literature by Daudet, et al. (U.S. Pat. No. 6,691,478) exists for a joist support apparatus. The invention describes a method of forming walls, floors, and ceiling wallboard construction frames. Many ceilings are suspended from roof decks and ceilings above. To form a ceiling that is structurally secure and fire safe various methods of construction and devices exist in the literature. Jahn describes such a system in U.S. Pat. No. 3,977,144. The ceiling panels are adapted to be successively installed in a suspended grid structure with reinforcing members secured by screws or a suitable adhesive to the associated panel. An example of further developments in the prior art are in U.S. Pat. No. 4,866,900 by Dunn describes a furring system for suspended ceilings that are interconnected and compliantly allow bending to relieve thermal expansion and has cross members formed of the channels. A similar invention in spirit is U.S. Pat. No. 4,850,169 by Burkstrand, et al. for a ceiling runner. The ceiling runner is comprised of an elongated generally U-shaped channel member having longitudinally spaced openings, each end portion is shaped to hold an upright C-stud therein. Essentially the patent describes a system of a particular geometry, for a runner to provide a structural support for a ceiling with wallboard panels.

While all these patents define construction fire safe methods for wallboard construction, they do not define walls that extend to the metal deck. Recent construction trends have wall extending fully, and new codes as described in NFPA regulations, must make the gap made between the metal deck and the head of the wall fire retardant and smoke retardant. A patent by Reynolds (U.S. Pat. No. 4,631,884) describes a building system for a curtain wall system with a finishing gasket means locking the infill in place, and having a wall extend up fully. But this patent is for a curtail type wall rather than a wallboard type construction, and does not solve the same problem as the present invention described herein. Prior art which approaches the problem of fireproofing the gap at head of wall and deck is the U.S. application no. 20030079425 by Morgan, et al.. The application describes a bag-like structure which fills gaps between ceiling and vertical walls (the problem addressed in this patent application), and other gaps and holes between walls. The method of which this application achieves this is by having a bag of sorts that is filled after construction with fire-retardant material creating a fire protecting barrier. The disadvantages of this patent are the complexity and cost. Although it solves the same problem, it also differs in approach. The work of this invention described herein, is for a pre-fabricated fire proof board which fits into the gap of the ceiling with a metal fluted deck and vertical head of wall gap.

OBJECTS AND ADVANTAGES OF THE INVENTION

The present invention contains specific objects and advantages that advance the prior art as described above in several ways:

(a) The pre-fabricated geometry of the fire-stop matching the gap of the metal fluted deck saves time and labor for wall board construction.

(b) The pre-fabricated geometry of the fire-stop matching the gap of the metal fluted deck saves material of filling and sealing the large gap necessary for ensuring a fire rating and the specified compression joint compression.

(c)The thickness of the fire stop allows for a fire-rating of one or two hours. (or any specified time and thickness rating specification necessary)

(d) Any fire rated material can be used and existing manufacturing processes for the specific material, thus making it simple and cost effective to manufacture.

(e) The metal J-channel allows for a dressed board for bare deck construction, providing an aesthetic appeal to the construction, and provides a dressing for falling of material.

(f) The mounting channel is easy to manufacture and implement for on site construction, and has the benefit of being out of the way of other mechanical, electrical, and other systems of buildings.

(g) Because of the material thickness and material, there is the added benefit of improving the noise-reduction characteristics of the spaces.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with the present invention of a fire stop system including: a pre-fabricated geometry deck specific fire-stop, a mounting channel, a method of construction which seals the gap at head of wall—metal deck interface. The present invention allows for a means of sealing the gap for smoke during fire, allows for a specified fire rating, allows for deck contraction and expansion, and reduces the time and cost of construction projects.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

The invention will be described further, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic perspective illustration of a typical building that may relay to the present invention, with some sections of the steelwork being shown, without the construction of auxiliary framework members and in-fills.

FIG. 2 is a fragmentary plan view of the basic steelwork layout of the building.

FIG. 3 is a exploded perspective illustration view of the rudimentary construction of a wallboard and a section of a metal deck as described in prior art.

FIG. 4 is a detailed illustration of the prior arts construction method of a wall assembly at the head of the wall with the metal deck above.

FIG. 5 is a perspective drawing, a front and side view illustration of the fire wall.

FIG. 6 is a exploded perspective illustration view of the rudimentary construction of a wallboard and a section of a metal for the present invention.

FIG. 7 is a detailed illustration of the present invention's construction method of a wall assembly at the head of the wall with the metal deck above.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES AND PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

Static Description of the Figures

FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic perspective illustration of a typical building with steel and structural work. It is provided for general background and to assist the any reader of the present invention with conceptualizing the patent. It is in no way to limit the patents scope, only to provide an example for the application of the patent. The four sides of the building are labeled A, B, C, D, and components are labeled numerically one through seven. 1 represents the foundation for the building. 2, 3, 4, 5 are structural columns with an additional one not shown at the intersection of face C and D of the structure. Element 6 is the roof, and 7 is a typical door.

FIG. 2 is a fragmentary plan view of the basic steelwork layout of the building show in showing the alternating arrangement of the primary vertical columns, the secondary vertical columns, and roof and floor beams. The drawing has three views labeled FIG. 2 a, b, and c. Each major element is labeled 1-11, and is consistent with all three views. FIG. 2 a represents a fragmentary top plan view, FIG. 2 b a side elevation, and FIG. 2 c and front elevation. Element 1 is the foundation; 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 are structural columns; 8-11 represent roof-supporting joists.

FIG. 3 is a exploded perspective illustration view of the rudimentary construction of a wallboard and a section of a metal deck. The elements 1 and 2 are the wall board sections secured on either side of the wall. 3 is the interior frame of the wall; 4 is the top of the frame; 5 is the bottom support anchored to the wall; 6 is one of the 5 studs in the frame. Element 7 is the metal deck above. The illustration is prior art given for reference.

FIG. 4 is a detailed illustration of the prior art's construction method of a wall assembly at the head of the wall with the metal roofing or ceiling deck above. A front view of the head of wall construction is shown, and a corresponding section shown in each drawing. The illustration is made of two sub-figure labeled FIGS. 4 a and 4 b. 1 is the floor or roof material that is above the metal deck; 2 is a dynamic joint as specified by structural engineer for the given roof, Element 3 indicates the metal deck; 4 is the wallboard, and in the section view each wall board is labeled 4 a and 4 b. Overlapping the stud on top of the frame of the wall is element 5, which is used to attach the wall to the metal roof; 6 is the head of the wall board the rd. In 4 b the wall is shown as a jagged cut, and in 4 a the wallboard is flush with the lower member of the deck.

FIG. 5 illustrates the fire wall of the present invention, and illustrates the major features in three views: one perspective illustration, a front view drawing, and a side view. In all three views the three major elements (the metal J-strip shown with hatched lines to indicate different material, the wallboard body, and the specific geometry matching the specific deck) are labeled 1, 2, and 3 respectively. FIG. 5 a is a perspective view, FIG. 5 b is a front view, and 5 c the corresponding side view.

FIG. 6 is a exploded perspective illustration view of the rudimentary construction of a wallboard and a section of a metal deck, as described in the present invention. The elements 1 and 2 are the wall board sections secured on either side of the wall. 3 is the interior frame of the wall; 4 is the top of the frame; 5 is the bottom support anchored to the wall; 6 is one of the 5 studs in the frame. Element 7 is the metal deck above. An example of the fire-wall as described in FIG. 5 is shown in elements 8 and 9; Along with a channel, 10, on top of the wall so 8 and 9 can be mounted. The dotted line shows how the figure is connected to the metal deck.

FIG. 7 is a detailed illustration of the current invention construction method of a wall assembly at the head of the wall with the metal roofing or ceiling deck above. A front view of the head of wall construction is shown, and a corresponding section shown. 1 indicates the material above the deck, either the roof or the floor above on the ceiling; 2 is the metal deck, and 4 is the fire wall underneath the deck, sealed by a thin layer of silicone 3. 4 is shown on both sides of the wall indicated by 4 a and 4 b. The J-channel is listed as element 5, and it is shown on each fire wall on either side of the wall in section A-A as 5 a and 5 b. The fire wall is shown overlapping 6, which represents a wallboard and is also shown on either side of the wall as 6 a and 6 b. 7 is the channel for mounting the wall board which goes over the top of the wall section, 8, the studs are not shown and indicated as a stud void in the figures. 4 is anchored in some fashion to the channel, 7, and 7 is then anchored to the metal deck. (9) is the compression joint, which is a space freed, that allows to compensate for the play of the deck. All surfaces should then be sealed.

Description of Preferred Embodiments

FIG. 1 and FIG. 2 discuss provide a background for the present invention. The present invention describes a novel fire wall system that applies to wallboard construction of buildings with roofing decks. Current construction methods no longer include hanging ceilings, and dividing walls extend to the metal deck above. This invention seeks meet specific fire safety requirements for this type of building construction. FIG. 1 shows a perspective illustration of a typical building structure where this type of construction applies. Current methods of wallboard construction often call for the wall boards to extend fro the floor (1) to the roofing deck under the roofing material (6). Within the second figure the structural components may be viewed. The fluted roofing deck is supported by elements structural columns (2-7) and the support joists (8-11).The wall boards placed parallel to the joist, and when placed under the deck create a gap between the metal deck and the head (or top) of the wall. The metal deck may also be for a ceiling if the building were to be a multi level building; however this would be obvious to those skilled in building design and constructions. The specifications for these structural can vary depending on the type and size building being constructed and its intended use, local codes, structural requirements, e.g., whether it will be a restaurant, storage facility, a retail store, a factory, etc. However, since these factors are issues with which those skilled in building design and construction are quite familiar, and are only provided for reference. They will not be further discussed in any great detail.

The wallboard's fundamental construction is shown in FIG. 3. A hollow wall having a plurality of spaced vertical studs (6), wallboards affixed to both sides of the plurality of studs (1,2), which) are fastened to the frame forming the wall, the height of the wallboard is made with the metal deck, as a section of which is shown, (7); The head of the wall, (4), and the deck are shown to have a gap which creates a fire safety hazard. In conventional wallboard construction methods, the wall is composed of a frame 3 (usually either metal or wood), and the wallboards are typically gypsum or drywall boards. To solve this problem, the present invention, describes a fire-wall which fills the gap of the invention, shown in FIG. 5.

In FIG. 5, an example of the fire stop is shown, with its basic elements. The board itself (2) should be comprised of a material and thickness to provide a specified fire rating, with a preferred embodiment being gypsum drywall board. The board is normally paper wrapped. A channel described as a J-channel (1), provides a guard against the adhesive losing its integrity, and allowing drywall to fall to the space below. In addition the J-Channel, provides an aesthetic clean look to the wallboard, rather than a course construction. The geometry of the notch is to be a “cookie-cutter” match of metal deck above, so that it may fit into the gap of the deck, and seal the head of wall and fluted metal deck interface. From FIG. 6, we may see how the notches of (8, 9) the wallboard, fit into the gaps of the metal deck (7). However, it should be noted that the geometry shown is specific to the deck shape. It is a preferred embodiment of the present invention that the geometry be any shape to seal the head of wall gap for any type of metal deck geometry. The fire stop should be mounted securely, in any way that is out of the way of the joists (as seen in FIG. 2 elements 8-11), and any other overhead construction elements such as sprinkler systems, cables, ducts, etc. The length and height of the fire-stop should be able to be easily handled by a single installer for ease, and long enough to be out of the way of overhead construction elements as well. The construction should also allow for a method of construction that permits for compliance from roof stresses above. Traditional methods call for a compression joint, of fire-proof material to absorb these stresses, and allow for a fire resistance of the same rating as the board. Common methods of construction are shown in FIG. 4.

A layer of gypsum wall board usually needs to be cut into the contour shape of the specific deck geometry (4 b: 4, 6) This leads to multiple problems, which is the need to make a specific contour for each panel. This is very time consuming and wasteful in materials and timing. This is the purpose of the preferred embodiment shown in (3) of FIG. 5. How the geometry will be improved in detail is illustrated in FIG. 7, of where a simple seal of fire rated silicone is applied to the exterior of the wallboard, with the fire stop (4) closing the gap from the head of wall to the metal deck (2). From the section of the said illustrations above (Section A-A in both figures), the compression joint of FIG. 4 b, is very difficult if not impossible for the tradesman or inspector to see and guarantee a one our minimum/specified rating. The need to cut the wallboard for each length to match the deck, and to fill the specified dimension (2 of FIG. 4), accounts for a great deal of time and material loss, along with possible insufficiencies in the fire protection rating of the filled gap at the head of wall and deck. In FIG. 4 a, illustrates another typical method of construction by not cutting the wall into a “cookie cutter match” of the deck, by simply filling it with a fire stop material (2, 6); This would allow for a meeting the required specification of the compression joint, but does so at material and labor waste. In addition there is no way to guarantee that the thickness is for the specified fire rating. It can be seen by inspection how the present invention guarantees a specified fire rating in Section A-A of FIG. 7, by having a fire-stop with the appropriate specified thickness for meeting the fire safety code requirements. To meet the need for the compliance for both the fire safety rating and stresses above the compression joint is relocated from the dimension shown as (2) in FIG. 4, to interior to the wall as shown as element (9) in FIG. 7 of the present invention. The mounting channel shown as (7) in FIG. 7 and (10) in FIG. 6, illustrate how the fire stop wall will be mounted. The mounting channel will fit over the studs and mounted to the metal deck (shown as a dotted line in FIG. 7). The gap between the board underneath ((6) in FIG. 7 and (1),(2) in FIG. 6) meet the specifications shown as (2) in FIG. 4, with the added advantage of no need for a fire material to be applied, because of fire protection from the fire wall, which is mounted on to the mounting channel. (shown as dotted lines adjoining fire wall to the channel in FIG. 7).

The mounting channel preferably should be made of a minimum 25 gauge galvanized steel, or some other material that meets possesses same structural integrity as the member. Mounting the fire stop wall on the outside although equivalent in function would not be as preferred as an internal method, because of possible difficulties in the construction of the wall due to interference from other building mechanisms and/or systems. The fire wall preferable should be comprised of gypsum material meeting ASTM 814 material requirements. The manufacture of the fire wall may be a cutting of existing boards, or made from current methods of injecting materials to form a prefabricated panel. The assembly of the mounting channel and fire stop must meet ASTM E 119 fire and structural tests for a specified fire rating, as well as NFPA and other code requirements.

It should be noted that the specification and examples given in this description are not to limit the scope of the invention, but rather are provided to understand the spirit and scope of the present invention described here-in. Those knowledgeable in construction methods, building, and materials arts are able to by reading the present invention and studying the prior art be able to implement the present invention. The scope of the invention should be understood by the claims here-in. 

1. A fire proof assembly and method of installation comprising of: a) fluted ceiling or floor deck construction; b) a vertical wall with a wallboard supported by a framework; c) a gap there, between the interface of the said vertical wall and deck; d) a fireboard e) a mounting channel
 2. The fireboard of claim 1 comprising of a fire retardant material, preferably gypsum-based composition, covering all and any for a specified fire rating.
 3. A geometry of fireboard of claim 1 that will match the contours of the fluted deck contours, thereby closing the gap at the interface of the deck and vertical wall as described in claim
 1. 4. The fireboard of claim 1 shall contain a channel at the bottom not allowing any gypsum material to fall in the space defined by the wallboard construction.
 5. A mounting channel to be placed over the top of the vertical wall framework of and anchored by mechanical means to the deck construction of frame
 1. 6. The wallboard of supported by the frame work of claim 1, should be placed under the mounting channel described in claim 5, to allow for play of stresses of the roofing deck described in claim 1; and should the gap formed should be overlapped by the fireboard described in claims 1 and
 2. 7. The entire fire proof assembly should meet the spirit of the current ASTM E-119 testing standard and any equivalent method. 